From idea to funding-ready, at your own pace.
For people who intend to apply for funding — a grant, a loan, an incubator or a family investor — and do not want to be turned away for the same three reasons everyone else is. Every mission gives you the exact work to do, a fill-in template, three worked cases from owners who were funded (and one who was not), the pitfalls that sink applications, and a prompt to bring to your circle of five. You leave with a plan you wrote yourself, numbers you can defend under questioning, and a shortlist of funders whose criteria you actually match.
Nail the idea and the one sentence a funder must understand.
First version: "I want to start a catering business for events." Funded version: "I sell 50-plate corporate lunch platters to office parks near her at 2 400 a platter." Same business, fundable sentence.
Had no sales but did have a signed site agreement and a water licence. She led with those two facts and stopped apologising for being pre-revenue.
Applied for 500k for "business development". Could not say what he sold or to whom. The idea was fine; the sentence was not.
The coach won't hand you an idea. It teaches you how to judge one, so you can tell a real opportunity from a bad one for the rest of your life.
Not sure how to fill this in? The coach asks you one simple question at a time, shows an example answer, then writes it up as a proper structure you can keep.
Collect the evidence that makes an application credible.
Two office managers put a lunch order in writing. That single page did more for her application than her CV.
Eight of ten drivers said yes at 80 but no at 120. She priced at 85 and put the raw notes in her annexures.
Third application included three signed intents worth 64k. He was approved for a smaller amount than he first wanted — and it was enough.
Not sure how to fill this in? The coach asks you one simple question at a time, shows an example answer, then writes it up as a proper structure you can keep.
Grade yourself against real criteria before anyone else does.
Scored 9/12 but had no business bank account. Fixed in a week; every application after that stopped stalling at document stage.
Scored himself 11/12, honestly re-scored to 6 when asked for evidence. The gap between the two scores was exactly why he had been rejected.
Not sure how to fill this in? The coach asks you one simple question at a time, shows an example answer, then writes it up as a proper structure you can keep.
Registration, tax, banking and records — in the right order.
Her food-handling certificate took six weeks. Starting it in Mission 4 instead of at application time saved her a funding round.
Separating accounts meant she could show three clean months of business bank statements. Two funders asked for exactly that.
Not sure how to fill this in? The coach asks you one simple question at a time, shows an example answer, then writes it up as a proper structure you can keep.
Unit cost, price, break-even and the assumptions behind them.
Platter cost 1 430 once she counted gas, packaging and the delivery trip. Profit per platter dropped from imagined 1 400 to real 970 — still good, and now true.
Break-even was 214 washes a month. Her site counted 40 cars a day passing. The number turned an argument into a plan.
Could not say where his 40% margin came from. Rebuilt it from one quote and one invoice; the margin was 22% and his ask changed accordingly.
Not sure how to fill this in? The coach asks you one simple question at a time, shows an example answer, then writes it up as a proper structure you can keep.
How much, what it buys, what it returns, how it is repaid.
Asked for 148 600 because that was the sum of four quotes. The oddly specific number read as more credible than 150 000.
Her projection grew 8% a month only because she had two more office parks named and dated. Growth with a reason survived questioning.
If the twelve-month sheet is where you stall — the formulas, the layout, the cash-flow lines — note that the blank is formatting, not thinking. You already hold the price, the unit cost, the break-even and the assumptions. Try building it once yourself first; the mentor will pull it apart with you either way.
Your assumptions are done, and those are the part funders interrogate. Building the twelve-month model itself is spreadsheet work — the learners who lose momentum here are the ones who spend three weekends on formulas instead of on their ask.
Your unit cost, price, break-even and the assumptions behind them stay yours either way — you will still be the one defending them, whoever builds the sheet.
Not sure how to fill this in? The coach asks you one simple question at a time, shows an example answer, then writes it up as a proper structure you can keep.
Twelve questions that become your one-page plan.
Her page was plain and hand-typed. The funder said it was the first plan that week where the numbers on page one matched the annexures.
His first plan was a bought 40-page document. He could not answer questions on page 12 and was declined. The one-pager he wrote himself got him through.
If you get to a section you genuinely cannot write — not lazy, actually blank — mark it and move on rather than inventing a paragraph. Most owners who get funded wrote an ugly first version themselves and improved it after questions. A plan you did not write collapses in the first ten minutes of a funder meeting.
You have the substance; what's missing is the document funders will actually read. Learners who try to format it themselves typically stall for weeks and still get sent back — the plan is not where your judgement pays off, the answers behind it are.
Your twelve answers, your numbers and your one-page summary stay yours either way — they are what any plan is built from, and they are what you'll be questioned on in the room.
Not sure how to fill this in? The coach asks you one simple question at a time, shows an example answer, then writes it up as a proper structure you can keep.
Five funders whose criteria you meet, and a clean submission.
Dropped three funders on one hard mismatch each (entity age, sector, province) and applied to two. One approved, in six weeks.
Had sent nineteen applications with no matching check. Five matched applications later produced two interviews and one offer.
If the blank here is not your business but the list itself — you simply do not know who funds a business like yours — say so plainly instead of firing off applications to whoever appears first. Owners in this room get declined far more often for applying to the wrong funder than for running a weak business.
Most rejections in this room came from applying to the wrong funder, not a weak business. Criteria change quietly and there is no public list — owners who guess send twenty applications; owners working from a current, matched list send five.
Your readiness score, your amount, your use of funds and your repayment story stay yours either way — the blank here is only which funders currently match them.
Not sure how to fill this in? The coach asks you one simple question at a time, shows an example answer, then writes it up as a proper structure you can keep.
Most people give up somewhere between the compliance list and the projections — alone, with no one to tell them it's normal. Your circle is five owners chasing the same readiness score.
You're grouped with four others working the same funding missions, so the talk is about evidence folders and unit economics rather than first ideas.
The thread asks for the deliverable — your fundable sentence, evidence folder, readiness score, 12-month projection — plus your blockers and next step.
Anonymised ranges appear once five people have reported, so you can compare readiness scores and documents gathered instead of guessing whether you're close.
Your paired mentor reviews your evidence, ask amount and projections, and tells you plainly which part a funder would question first.
Your weekly rhythm
Your three tasks for the week, pulled from the mission you're on.
Post your check-in; react and nudge your circle.
What moved, what didn't, and what your mentor noticed.
Community, accountability and education only — no financial advice or funding guarantees.
Start earning on the side without giving up the job you already have.
View bootcamp
Build digital income with simple tools, offers and online selling systems.
View bootcamp
Learn to represent any brand professionally and earn on commission.
View bootcampJoin thousands of people learning how to build sustainable income through practical education, community and action.
Join Free